As soon as he announced he would stick to the 15,000 figure, Biden came under intense pressure from supporters of the left. Yesterday, he bowed to this pressure, announcing that the country would host 62,500 refugees over the next six months. Who was leading the charge here and how did they finally persuade the White House to change course?
A number of people have criticized the White House’s decision to maintain this cap for refugees. The White House did not expect a backlash, believing the public would focus on removing the Trump-era restrictions that made it difficult for African refugees to come to the United States. Instead, Democrats in Congress, advocates and refugee resettlement agencies criticized the administration for maintaining the cap.
It’s important to note that historically, presidents formalized the new cap shortly after formal consultation with Congress. Biden had already delayed more than a month, despite a call from his secretary of state, Antony Blinken, to keep his pledge.
There is a difference between refugees, who are recognized by the international community as fleeing human rights violations at home, and asylum seekers, who do not always fit this description, but who represent a large part of migrants arriving in the United States. Southern border of the States. Will this decision have an impact on the tense situation at the border?
Not immediately. As you can see, we are talking about two different immigrant populations here.
Refugees apply to come to the United States from overseas and go through a rigorous screening process before boarding the plane. Many of those at the border came from Central America and walked on American soil to seek asylum.
The United States has long believed that a strategy to discourage migrants from making the dangerous journey to the border provides more opportunities in Central America to apply for the refugee program – essentially allowing them to seek protection from states. -United but without leaving their country of origin. . Raising the ceiling is a step towards this goal, but it will take some time to develop the infrastructure.
The White House has clarified that while the number of 62,500 is the annual target Biden threw in during the campaign, he doesn’t expect to hit that number. It seems unlikely that there are simply not enough people fleeing danger in foreign countries to reach this limit. So what’s stopping the United States from reaching its new cap?